Independent confirmation that THE rspca IS CORRUPT.

This is the Category on this BEWARErspca Bulletin Board, part of the Global Internet SELF HELP Justice Network at http://SelfHelpJustice.com/ for publishing Details of rspca Shonks & Shysters [ie ones who 'use' the law to cheat others] in Australia. [The server is not in Australia.]

Independent confirmation that THE rspca IS CORRUPT.

Postby russellm » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:36 am

Independent confirmation that THE rspca IS CORRUPT.

BEWARErspca Group claims credit for DEMISE of 'Animal Rescue'

Individuals' Production Credits for 'Animal Rescue'

SEVEN Network AXES rspca's 'Animal Rescue'

Corrupt individuals in the production of 'Animal Rescue'
.
Independent confirmation that THE rspca IS CORRUPT.

'Animal Rescue': TV promotion of Australian rspca, AXED

rspca loses its Prime Time TV promotion

HaigReport Group claims credit for DEMISE of 'Animal Rescue'

Seven Network WITCH-HUNT for those responsible for misleading the directors

PRAISE for SEVEN Network Directors: AXING rspca's TV promotion

Contact, regarding Directors' Duties, ASIC [Australia Securities and Investment Commission] & Kerry Stokes, Chairman, and DIRECTOR, Seven Network Limited, which telecast the Show, named 'Animal Rescue(sic)' greatly promoting the rspca


The SEVEN NETWORK, an Australian Television Network has confirmed that the rspca organisation in Australia is corrupt, by seven's axing the rspca TV promotion called 'Animal Rescue (sic)'. Corporations Law in Australia means that Directors of Companies, Public and private, cannot promote criminal activity nor gain from criminal activity. Because adverse consequences would likely follow a company's criminal activity, such would greatly derogate the trading price of shares of publicly listed companies. Hence, directors of a publicly listed company would be foolhardy in the extreme to promote criminal activity. They would also leave themselves vulnerable to a class action by shareholders of that public company and any other public company of which they are a director.

This is an example of an EXISTING SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE to Courts of Law, to 'punish criminals' and wrong doers in general, but it is not applicable in all circumstances. Where these particular circumstances exist, it is exceedingly successful. It is not only the publicity of the internet, but is an advance on that publicity, and has that as a necessary element. This Alternative extends across jurisdictional boundaries, EXCLUDES LAWYERS [but not a superior knowledge of the 'law'] and is a creature in many ways, of the Internet. This is a boon for HONEST PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE COURTS OF LAW AND LAWYERS, IN GENERAL, ARE SO CORRUPT.

It involves others in 'power' making 'legal and effectively legally binding decisions'. Its effectiveness is increased as the 'criminal' or 'criminals' do not have to be given 'Due Process' and they do not even need to be given the corner stone of Natural Justice aka Procedural Fairness, of a Right to be Heard.

Decisions are made. These decisions have a legal import. Hence there are 'Legal Decision Makers'. Unlike the situation with Judges in Courts of Law, these 'Decision Makers' do not have 'Judicial Immunity'. 'Judicial Immunity' means that judges can make incompetent or even knowingly wrong decisions for corrupt purposes and they still have 'Judicial Immunity". In the US Jail4Judges and FloridaJail4Judges are fighting, and have been fighting against Judicial Immunity for many years. The progress is occurring through a greater understanding of the existence of 'Judicial Immunity' and the costs it imposes upon society.

Contact, regarding Directors' Duties, ASIC [Australia Securities and Investment Commission] & Kerry Stokes, Chairman, and DIRECTOR, Seven Network Limited, which telecast the Show, named 'Animal Rescue(sic)' greatly promoting the rspca

The subject of this dissertation is not an alternative to, nor superior to, abolition of Judicial Immunity, but it is available here and now, but it is not available in all circumstances. Abolition of Judicial Immunity, is the 'final goal'; the 'end game'. Additionally what this 'Method', the subject of this treatise shows is the Need for the abolition of Judicial Immunity.

The 'Decision Makers' in this 'Method' are Company Directors. Across all Jurisdictions, the duties of Company directors, arise from Common Law and [or In Civil jurisdictions, only] Government Regulation. With the might of companies increasing, and the fact that they are operating across jurisdictional boundaries, so the extent of these onerous duties is increasing. The other aspect involved is that of FINANCIAL MARKETS, and public listing of the company's equity. Increasingly financial markets are becoming global. The PRIME CONSIDERATION of DIRECTORS of PUBLIC COMPANIES and participants investing their own money, or answerable for the investment of the money of others, is SELF INTEREST. This is missing from courts of law, due to the existence of 'Judicial Immunity'.

This STRATEGY involves the criminal or wrong doer, dealing with a company, not necessarily a public company, but a company who has one or more directors who are also directors of a Public company with its shares traded on a Public market somewhere, anywhere. If a criminal is so dealing, the company is either or both, supporting a criminal and gaining a benefit from a criminal or wrong doer. The onerous duties of directors means that they must not gain benefit from crime or assist crime, and THEY HAVE A DUTY TO INVESTIGATE, even if not put on notice. What is more, they have the resources to investigate.


Seven Network Limited Board of Directors have decided that the Seven Network should never again telecast 'Animal Rescue' as it was promoting a group of organisations, amongst whom were many criminal organizations.

Contact, regarding Directors' Duties, ASIC [Australia Securities and Investment Commission] & Kerry Stokes, Chairman, and DIRECTOR, Seven Network Limited, which telecast the Show, named 'Animal Rescue(sic)' greatly promoting the rspca

We, at the HaigReport/BEWARErspca Internet Group of Websites are totally independent of the SEVEN Network Limited; [or to the mathematicians amongst you, maybe even INVERSELY DEPENDENT, eh Kerry and the 'No Funsie Munsie'?]. They would definitely not make a decision to support us. Still, Seven has AXED the gaumless fiction 'Animal Rescue'. This was not done lightly as 'Animal Rescue' was a financial windfall for Seven. Clearly, the rspca was prepared to contribute as it gave that criminal organization great PR converted immediately to a financial windfall by way of donations, and creating a major false impression in the population of Australia. As well, "Co-operating with criminals and representatives of criminal organizations, can be viewed as 'CONSPIRACY'. The corrupt multi-millions of dollars that the rspca make annually by stealing and selling all manner of animals, plus assisting other criminals in their pursuits, pales into insignificance against the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, associated with the SEVEN Network Limited and KKR who funded the 'partial buyout' of the operations of the Seven Network.

Animal rescue was the frontline promotion of rspca in Australia. We have been instrumental in having the Seven Network Limited AXE that show because it was promoting the corruption of the rspca. We had to bring it to the notice of the Directors of Seven Network Limited. Directors are not courts of law and do not need to see proof to the criminal onus of 'beyond reasonable doubt', before they act. THEY CANNOT SAY 'SHOW ME THE FINDINGS OF A COURT OR INQUIRY'. They are required to inquire themselves. They have a highly responsible and onerous duty. They have a duty to inquire even if not put on notice. They do not owe Natural Justice aka Due Process to the likes of rspca. Hence, they do not need to hear the 'rspca side'. If Directors knowingly permit their company to assist or promote crime or criminal organizations or gain benefit from crime or criminal organizations, those directors can be PERSONALLY LIABLE. As well, the company can be liable to disgourge the 'profits' it has made from crime. For a public company, such a revelation would cause such a drop in share price, that the company could fail. The destruction could extend to other companies which have common directors. The revelation would be a scandal, of mammoth proportions.

The decision was a unilateral decision of Seven Network Limited board. The directors did not, and did not need to, consult with the rspca or the production company 'Beyond International Group' nor its Producers David Galloway or Brad Lyons who preceded Lisa Fitzpatrick now Seven Network's program development head.

No rspca would dare sue, as then all the crime that has been occurring in the rspca, and there is plenty, would be aired. We name here all individuals whose names appear on websites associated with 'Animal Rescue' or its production or production company. Google will index all these as keywords.

Still, the various State DPIs continue to support the rspca.

Contact, regarding Directors' Duties, ASIC [Australia Securities and Investment Commission] & Kerry Stokes, Chairman, and DIRECTOR, Seven Network Limited, which telecast the Show, named 'Animal Rescue(sic)' greatly promoting the rspca


We claim full credit for this development. This show Animal Rescue has been for some time promoting the rspca in Australia as though it is a good and caring organization. The reality is diametrically opposed. In fact, as we can show and have repeatedly, the rspca in Australia is a collection of many corrupt organizations.
regards,

Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
User avatar
russellm
Site Admin
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:30 am

Re: Independent confirmation that THE rspca IS CORRUPT.

Postby robertrogers » Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:16 am

When RSPCA Come always have a camera ready and a voice recorder and take lots of photos of them - it is your right. Do not take any notice of them when they tell you that you cannot take photos or record them. It is your property they are on. They lie in court and fabricate evidence - you will need these photos and voice recordings for your legal protection - do not let them defeat you with their fabricated stories and perjury.

RSPCA, under the Animal Care and Protection Act can steal your evidence. If they are coming lock up your records in your car boot or elsewhere. When you go to court you will have lost your evidence and witnesses, the only evidence will be the lies and fabrications RSPCA present. When you see them rub the chicken into dirt and hold it up to the camera, take photos of them doing it.

Imagination Television "RSPCA Animal Rescue" film crew go with RSPCA Inspectors onto people's propeties pretending to be RSPCA collecting evidence. You have rights. Tell them they are not to come onto your property to film. If they do they have then caused a tresspass. In Queensland DPI&F contract the Administration of the Animal Care and Protection Act to RSPCA. This contract specifically states RSPCA are not to bring media with them.

When the defamation begins after their raid and the photos they took appear on the Internet and in newspapers remember to make them pay. Invasion of Privacy Act has criminal penalities so push the Police to charge them or put the evidence together and pass it to the Director of Public Prosecutions and go public wit hit. Find someone who knows a bit about the law and how to do it yourself. The legally most powerful person in the system is the self represented - they have unlimited legal resources compared to RSPCA and others who have to use lawyers.
robertrogers
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:41 pm


Return to Special Australian site for rspca matters in Australia.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron