RSPCA Blog

Russell G H Mathews, from: Queensland Dated: 21.03.08 Time: 14:51

The rspca, anywhere and everywhere in the world, is not motivated by the love of animals nor by ideology. It is motivated solely by money and power for parasites.

The general Australian community believe that the rspca is all about lovely puppy dogs and caring for animals. It would probably surprise those people that the rspca KILL MANY TIMES more animals than they save and \"re-home\". It is far easier to just kill them. Of course, that is not the line the rspca push. It is all about money and perks for those on the \"inside\". Afterall, incompetent parasites also have wishes and desires, and this is one way for some to achieve them.

The rspca wish to extend the publicity they gain to increase the inflow of money and BEQUESTS from MISGUIDED OLDER AUSTRALIANS, who do NOT have animals. Older Australian who have animals are some of the vulnerable people that the rspca TARGETS to bully and intimidate and about whom to FABRICATE EVIDENCE. Those vulnerable people are prosecuted by the rspca. The other major class that the rspca target because they have found from experience, are the easiest targets, are SINGLE WOMEN, ESPECIALLY OLDER SINGLE WOMEN. The rspca is NOT driven by ideology.

Those poor vulnerable people turn up to court thinking that since they have done no wrong, they need only tell the truth, and do not need to be represented by a lawyer. As well, they are usually so traumatised by the bullying and intimidation by the rspca and the stealing or the simple killing, of their animals by the rspca, that they are not thinking clearly. They are shocked when they are confronted by FABRICATED EVIDENCE that has been fabricated by the rspca. The favourite method employed by the rspca leeches, is to find an incompetent and compromised vet. [They find quite a few and ensure they are compromised.] She will make a litany of false allegations and swear them in an affidavit. One such has been a Vicki Lomax. You can see more about her at http://HaigReport.com/rspcavickylomaxrspcawhoreandparasite.html [cut and paste it]/.

The rspca is regularily complaining that it costs them too much money to hold the animals while there are legal proceedings. Hence, a more attractive method for them is to first shoot the animals and then take court proceedings, again with fabricated evidence. This was the case with Ruth Downey\'s 48 healthy cattle. See the details http://BEWARErspca.com/rspcabrutallyslaughterruths48cattle.html [cut and paste it]/.

We wish to tabulate people\'s experience with the rspca in Australia. Please record yours on this blog below.

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
Legal Researcher.

shelly, from: brisbane Dated: 22.04.08 Time: 10:26

a customer was telling me about how his wife tried to help out the rspca by looking after two 2 week old female kittens, 8 weeks later they wanted them back, but they where too attached by then, so the rspca at dakabin said ok but they had to desex them so the next day they where ready to pick from there urine soaked environment covered in fleas, JUST AFTER SURGERY AND THEY HAD TO PAY $500, but they believed they couldn\'t make a difference by telling authorities......I wonder how many others feel this way?